Crisis hits federal varsity (Wukari) over VC selection process
A major dispute has erupted at the Federal University Wukari (FUW) in Taraba State over the process to appoint its next Vice‑Chancellor, threatening smooth transition of leadership and raising concerns about transparency in governance. The crisis has stirred debate among stakeholders as tensions rise over authority, procedure, and institutional legitimacy.
Quick Insight:
A Vice‑Chancellor is the chief executive of a university, and how they are appointed can shape policy, academic direction, staff morale, and institutional stability.
1. What Triggered the Crisis
• The university’s Pro‑Chancellor and Chairman of the Governing Council issued a directive to **suspend the ongoing Vice‑Chancellor selection process** just weeks after it began.
• The suspension notice also outlined plans to appoint an Acting Vice‑Chancellor when the current incumbent’s tenure ends early next year.
• Contract payments were frozen and council meetings were halted, adding to uncertainty among staff and students.
2. Stakeholders Push Back
• A civil society group and other stakeholders objected to the suspension, arguing that only the full Governing Council — not the chairman acting alone — has the authority to stop or alter the process.
• Critics also noted that the university Senate, rather than external officials, should have a role in appointing an Acting Vice‑Chancellor under established rules.
• The petitioners questioned why the process was halted after the council had already set timelines and interview panels in motion.
3. Leadership Responds
• The incumbent Vice‑Chancellor rejected allegations of interference, describing them as misleading.
• He noted that the council had approved the appointment timeline and that job advertisements had been published months earlier.
• He also questioned why the suspension focused only on the Vice‑Chancellor’s role and not on other key appointments underway.
4. Why It Matters
• Leadership transitions at universities are sensitive and must be handled with transparency to maintain confidence among students, staff, and the broader academic community.
• Protracted disputes can affect morale, disrupt planning, and slow academic activities.
• Observers stress the importance of due process, collective decision‑making, and adherence to university laws to avoid long‑term reputational damage.
Final Thoughts
The unfolding vice‑chancellor selection dispute at Federal University Wukari highlights broader challenges in higher education governance, where clarity of process, shared authority, and stakeholder trust are essential. Resolving this crisis with respect for institutional rules and fairness will be key to sustaining confidence in Nigerian universities.
Tip: Governance disputes in universities often stem from unclear procedures or perceptions of bias. Clear communication and adherence to established rules help prevent disruptions.
.jpeg)
