Arguments in Favor (Yes, Coding Should Replace Handwriting):

• 21st Century Relevance: Coding is a critical skill in today’s digital economy, essential for careers in technology, science, finance, and more. Teaching it early prepares students for the future.
• Global Opportunities: Tech skills, especially programming, open doors to remote jobs, freelancing, and international opportunities that handwriting simply does not offer.
• Digital Communication Dominates: In a world where people rarely write by hand anymore, especially in professional settings, coding is far more practical and useful.
• Problem-Solving & Logic: Coding teaches analytical thinking, logic, and creativity—skills that are more beneficial than memorizing how to form cursive letters.
• Accessibility & Efficiency: Typing is faster and more accessible for students with disabilities. Coding boosts digital fluency, which is key in inclusive education.

Arguments Against (No, Handwriting Should Not Be Replaced):

• Foundational Literacy: Handwriting is foundational to reading and writing development. Young children need to physically write to grasp language structure and spelling.
• Cognitive Development: Studies show that handwriting activates brain regions tied to memory and learning more deeply than typing or coding.
• Not Everyone Becomes a Coder: Coding may not be relevant to every child’s future. It’s important to provide balanced learning that supports multiple pathways, including the arts and humanities.
• Handwriting is a Life Skill: Handwriting is still needed for note-taking, exams, signatures, and day-to-day communication, especially in less digitized environments.
• Both Can Coexist: Rather than replacing handwriting, schools can integrate both handwriting and coding into the curriculum to offer a more comprehensive education.